| S.No. |
ENTITY |
PERSONS |
REGULATORY CHARGES |
REGULATORY ACTION(S) / DATE OF ORDER |
FURTHER DEVELOPMENTS |
| 1 |
|
AVS PLANTATIONS LTD.
|
|
|
ALLEGED UNLAWFUL MOBILISATION OF FUNDS UNDER CIS
|
NO ACTION
24-NOV-2003
|
COMPANY STATED IT DID NOT MOBILISE ANY FUNDS UNDER CIS
|
| 2 |
|
GAURAV KRISHI BAGH VIKASH PVT.LTD.
|
|
|
ALLEGED UNLAWFUL MOBILISATION OF FUNDS UNDER CIS
|
NO ACTION
24-NOV-2003
|
OBTAINED POSITIVE CONSENT FROM MORE THAN 25% INVESTORS TO CONTINUE
|
| 3 |
|
GOVARDHAN ENVIROTECH PVT.LTD.
|
|
|
ALLEGED UNLAWFUL MOBILISATION OF FUNDS UNDER CIS
|
NO ACTION
24-NOV-2003
|
OBTAINED POSITIVE CONSENT FROM MORE THAN 25% INVESTORS TO CONTINUE
|
| 4 |
|
HARYANA FOREST LTD.
|
|
|
ALLEGED UNLAWFUL MOBILISATION OF FUNDS UNDER CIS
|
NO ACTION
24-NOV-2003
|
COMPANY STATED IT DID NOT MOBILISE ANY FUNDS UNDER CIS
|
| 5 |
|
KASTURCHAND RAKA PLANTATIONS LTD.
|
|
|
ALLEGED UNLAWFUL MOBILISATION OF FUNDS UNDER CIS
|
NO ACTION
24-NOV-2003
|
OBTAINED POSITIVE CONSENT FROM MORE THAN 25% INVESTORS TO CONTINUE
|
| 6 |
|
KEFFEL FINANCE LTD.
|
|
|
ALLEGED UNLAWFUL MOBILISATION OF FUNDS UNDER CIS
|
NO ACTION
24-NOV-2003
|
COMPANY STATED IT DID NOT MOBILISE ANY FUNDS UNDER CIS
|
| 7 |
|
MARIGOLD FORESTS PVT.LTD.
|
|
|
ALLEGED UNLAWFUL MOBILISATION OF FUNDS UNDER CIS
|
NO ACTION
24-NOV-2003
|
OBTAINED POSITIVE CONSENT FROM MORE THAN 25% INVESTORS TO CONTINUE
|
| 8 |
|
PACL INDIA LTD.
|
|
|
ALLEGED UNLAWFUL MOBILISATION OF FUNDS UNDER CIS
|
NO ACTION
24-NOV-2003
|
CHALLENGED CONSTITUTIONAL VALIDITY OF THE REGULATIONS
OBTAINED A STAY ORDER FROM THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT
|
| 9 |
|
PARAMOUNT BIO-TECH INDUSTRIES LTD.
(CIN:U24231DL1996PLC082959 PAN:AACCP1163C)
|
|
|
ALLEGED UNLAWFUL MOBILISATION OF FUNDS UNDER CIS
|
NO ACTION
24-NOV-2003
|
CHALLENGED CONSTITUTIONAL VALIDITY OF THE REGULATIONS
OBTAINED A STAY ORDER FROM THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT
|
| 10 |
|
PASHUDHAN AGROTEC LTD.
|
|
|
ALLEGED UNLAWFUL MOBILISATION OF FUNDS UNDER CIS
|
NO ACTION
24-NOV-2003
|
OBTAINED POSITIVE CONSENT FROM MORE THAN 25% INVESTORS TO CONTINUE
|
| 11 |
|
ROYAL FLOREX LTD.
|
|
|
ALLEGED UNLAWFUL MOBILISATION OF FUNDS UNDER CIS
|
NO ACTION
24-NOV-2003
|
COMPANY STATED IT DID NOT MOBILISE ANY FUNDS UNDER CIS
|
| 12 |
|
STANFORD (I) CONSULTANTS
|
|
|
ALLEGED UNLAWFUL MOBILISATION OF FUNDS UNDER CIS
|
NO ACTION
24-NOV-2003
|
COMPANY STATED IT DID NOT MOBILISE ANY FUNDS UNDER CIS
|
| 13 |
|
VINAY SHETH / JAYRAJ SHETH
|
|
|
ALLEGED UNLAWFUL MOBILISATION OF FUNDS UNDER CIS
|
NO ACTION
24-NOV-2003
|
OBTAINED POSITIVE CONSENT FROM MORE THAN 25% INVESTORS TO CONTINUE
|
| The regulatory charges/regulatory actions may be fully or partly applicable to the entities/persons mentioned in the second column. |