| S.No. |
ENTITY |
PERSONS |
REGULATORY CHARGES |
REGULATORY ACTION(S) / DATE OF ORDER |
FURTHER DEVELOPMENTS |
| 1 |
|
BONAFIDE STOCK & CAPITAL PVT.LTD.
(Member : ASE,Sub-Broker of ASE CAPITAL MARKETS LTD., Member : BSE/NSE)
|
|
|
DEALT WITH UN-REGISTERED SUB-BROKERS
ALLEGED DISCREPANCIES IN MAINTAINING ORDER BOOKS
|
REACHED SETTLEMENT ( SETTLEMENT CHARGES RS.1,50,000 VIDE CONSENT ORDER)
30-OCT-2009
|
|
| 2 |
|
|
GALAXY BROKING LTD.
(PAN:AABCG5457B)
(Member : BSE)
|
|
|
|
ANIL AMRUITLAL GANDHI
PAN:ACIPG8954B
|
|
ACTED IN CONCERT WITH ITS CLIENTS AND PROMOTERS OF COMPANIES/INTER CONNECTED ENTITIES TO CREATE ARTIFICIAL MARKET AND PRICE RISE IN CASE OF MANY COMPANIES
DID NOT ADHERE TO "KNOW YOUR CLIENT" DIRECTIVES/INSTRUCTIONS/GUIDELINES
DID NOT EXERCISE DUE SKILL AND DILIGENCE WHILE OPENING CLIENTS' ACCOUNTS
INDULGED IN INDIRECT FUNDING TO CLIENTS
DID NOT EXPLAIN VARIOUS AMOUNTS SHOWN IN CREDIT SIDE OF ITS BOOKS OF ACCOUNTS
DID NOT ENTER INTO TRIPARTITE AGREEMENT WITH CLIENTS COMING THROUGH SUB-BROKERS
PERMITTED TRADING TERMINALS AT UNAUTHORISED LOCATIONS
DID NOT ADHERE TO CONDITIONS OF PROVISIONAL REGISTRATION
DEALT WITH UN-REGISTERED SUB-BROKERS
DEALT IN CASH WITH CLIENTS
|
DEBARRED / RESTRAINED FROM ASSOCIATING WITH / ACCESSING CAPITAL MARKET / INTERMEDIARIES FROM 24-JAN-2006 TILL FURTHER ORDERS
24-JAN-2006
REACHED SETTLEMENT ( SETTLEMENT CHARGES RS.1,00,000 VIDE CONSENT ORDER)
07-JAN-2008
|
CONFIRMED AD-INTERIM ORDER DATED 24/01/2006 AND DIRECTED DEPOSITORIES NO TO GIVE EFFECT TO ANY TRANSFER OF SHARES OF THE COMPANIES AS PER TABLE 1 IN ORDER, LYING IN THE BENEFICIAL OWNER ACCOUNTS OF CLIENTS, AS PER ORDER DATED 21/12/2006
AD-INTERIM ORDER DATED 24/01/2006 DISPOSED OFF, AS APPLICANT AGREED TO PAY RS.1,00,000 TOWARDS SETTLEMENT CHARGES, AS PER CONSENT ORDER DATED 07/01/2008
|
| 3 |
|
|
ITI FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD.
(PAN:AAACI8316C)
(Member : NSE/MCX/BSE)
|
|
|
ALLEGED FAILURE IN SETTLEMENT OF FUND OF ALL CLIENTS AT LEAST ONCE IN A CALENDER QUARTER OR MONTH
|
REACHED SETTLEMENT ( SETTLEMENT CHARGES RS.42,90,000 VIDE CONSENT ORDER)
21-MAR-2017
|
|
| 4 |
|
|
KOTAK SECURITIES LTD.
(PAN:AAACK3436F)
(Member : OTC)
|
|
|
|
NARAYAN S.A.
|
|
DID NOT MAINTAIN CLIENT DATABASE
FAILED TO OBTAIN WITNESS SIGNATURES
DID NOT SUBMIT COPY OF RECEIPT OF BANK STATEMENTS
DID NOT SUBMIT COPY OF BANK PASSBOOK FROM ANY OF THE CLIENTS ALONG WITH CLIENT REGISTRATION FORM
DID NOT COLLECT UPFRONT MARGINS
DID NOT EXERCISE DUE CARE AND DILIGENCE
OBTAINED PROOF OF IDENTITY OF ONLY DESIGNATED DIRECTORS/PARTNERS OF CORPORATE/PARTNERSHIP CLIENTS AND NOT OF PROMOTERS/KEY MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL
|
IMPOSED PENALTY RS.10,00,000
18-DEC-2006
REACHED SETTLEMENT (SETTLEMENT CHARGES RS.10,00,000, LEGAL EXPENSES RS.4,00,000 VIDE CONSENT ORDER)
30-JUN-2009
|
SAT: ORDER DATED 18/12/2006 DISPOSSED OFF AS APPLICANT AGREED TO PAY RS.14,00,000 TOWARDS SETTLEMENT CHARGES AND RS.4,00,000 TOWARDS LEGAL EXPENSES AS PER CONSENT ORDER
|
| 5 |
|
|
KOTAK SECURITIES LTD.
(PAN:AAACK3436F)
(Member : BSE/NSE)
|
|
|
|
NARAYAN S.A.
|
|
DID NOT MAINTAIN CLIENT DATABASE
FAILED TO OBTAIN WITNESS SIGNATURES
DID NOT SUBMIT COPY OF RECEIPT OF BANK STATEMENTS
DID NOT SUBMIT COPY OF BANK PASSBOOK FROM ANY OF THE CLIENTS ALONG WITH CLIENT REGISTRATION FORM
DID NOT COLLECT UPFRONT MARGINS
DID NOT EXERCISE DUE CARE AND DILIGENCE
OBTAINED PROOF OF IDENTITY OF ONLY DESIGNATED DIRECTORS/PARTNERS OF CORPORATE/PARTNERSHIP CLIENTS AND NOT OF PROMOTERS/KEY MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL
|
IMPOSED PENALTY RS.10,00,000
18-DEC-2006
REACHED SETTLEMENT (SETTLEMENT CHARGES RS.10,00,000, LEGAL EXPENSES RS.4,00,000 VIDE CONSENT ORDER)
30-JUN-2009
|
SAT: ORDER DATED 18/12/2006 DISPOSSED OFF AS APPLICANT AGREED TO PAY RS.10,00,000 TOWARDS SETTLEMENT CHARGES AND RS.4,00,000 TOWARDS LEGAL EXPENSES AS PER CONSENT ORDER
|
| 6 |
|
|
MG CAPITAL SERVICES LTD.
(CIN:U74899DL1994PLC061509
PAN:AAACM6670R)
(Member : NSE)
|
|
|
ALLEGED DISCREPANCY IN ISSUANCE OF CONTRACT NOTES
ALLEGED FAILURE IN MAINTENANCE OF CLIENT DATABASE
ALLEGED NON-COMPLIANCE OF REQUIREMENTS OF UNIQUE CLIENT CODE
ALLEGED DELAY IN DELIVERY OF SECURITIES WITHIN STIPULATED TIME
ALLEGED NON-SEGREGATION OF CLIENT FUNDS FROM BROKERS FUNDS
ALLEGED DEFAULT IN MAINTENANCE OF BOOK OF ACCOUNTS AND RECORDS
ALLEGED DELAY IN MAKING PAYMENT TO CLIENTS
ALLEGED INDULGENCE IN PRO ACCOUNT TRADING
|
REACHED SETTLEMENT ( SETTLEMENT CHARGES RS.3,35,000 VIDE CONSENT ORDER)
31-OCT-2008
|
|
| 7 |
|
|
PRADEEP KUMAR BANSAL,M/S
(Member : UPSE/CSE/ICSE)
|
|
|
|
PRADEEP KUMAR BANSAL
|
|
EXECUTED SINGLE TRADES AT EXCHANGE TO ASCERTAIN PRICES FOR EXECUTING BULK ORDERS ILLEGALLY OUTSIDE THE EXCHANGE MECHANISM
DID NOT REPORT OFF-THE-FLOOR TRANSACTIONS TO THE EXCHANGE
DID NOT FURNISH CORRECT INFORMATION TO INSPECTING TEAM REGARDING BANK ACCOUNTS
INDULGED IN CREATION OF ARTIFICIAL MARKET AND PRICE MANIPULATION IN SCRIP OF AURANGABAD CRYOGENICS LTD. (NOW KNOWN AS BANSAL NATUREVEST LTD.)
DEFICIENCIES IN MEMBER-CLIENT AGREEMENTS
DEFICIENCIES IN REGISTRATION FORMS
DID NOT ISSUE CONTRACT NOTES
DID NOT MAINTAIN SEGREGATION BETWEEN CLIENT FUNDS AND OWN FUNDS
DID NOT MAKE PAYMENTS TO CLIENTS IN TIME
DID NOT COLLECT MARGINS FROM CLIENTS
DID NOT RECORD TIME OF PLACEMENT OF ORDERS ON CONTRACT NOTES
DEFAULTED IN MAINTENANCE OF DOCUMENTS REGISTER
DEFAULTED IN MAINTENANCE OF MARGIN DEPOSIT BOOK
EXECUTED TRADES FOR CLIENTS THROUGH PROPRIETARY ACCOUNT TO EVADE COLLECTION OF MARGINS
|
CANCELLED REGISTRATION AS STOCK BROKER FROM 23-JUL-2003 TO 22-JUL-2008
28-JUN-2006
REACHED SETTLEMENT ( SETTLEMENT CHARGES RS.25,00,000, LEGAL EXPENSES RS.2,50,000 VIDE CONSENT ORDER)
REACHED SETTLEMENT (CONSENT ORDER) (AGREED VOLUNTARILY TO BE SUSPENDED FROM REGISTRATION AS STOCK BROKER) FROM 23-JUL-2003 TO 22-JUL-2008
09-JUN-2008
|
SAT: APPLICANT AGREED TO PAY A SUM OF RS.25,00,000 TOWARDS SETTLEMENT CHARGES AND RS.2,50,000 TOWARDS LEGAL EXPENSES AS PER CONSENT ORDER DATED 09/06/2008 AND VOLUNTARILY UNDERTAKEN TO REMAIN SUSPENDED FOR A PERIOD OF 5 YEARS COMMENCING FROM 23/07/2003. ORDER DATED 28/06/2006 SET ASIDE
|
| 8 |
|
|
RELIANCE SHARE & STOCK BROKERS PVT.LTD.
(Member : BSE/NSE/CSE/VSE/BGSE/ASE/OTC)
|
|
|
|
AMITABH JHUNJHUNWALA
|
|
|
D.H.SHAH
|
|
|
R.P.MEHTA
|
|
DEFAULTED IN MAINTENANCE OF BOOKS OF ACCOUNTS
DEFAULTED IN MAINTENANCE OF SAUDA BOOK
DID NOT ISSUE CONTRACT NOTES
DID NOT MENTION CLIENT NUMBERS ON CONTRACT NOTES
CARRIED OUT TRANSACTION IN ITS OWN NAME INSTEAD OF CLIENTS NAME
COMMITTED IRREGULARITIES IN RESPECT OF CONTRACT NOTES
PAN NO. OF CLIENTS NOT APPEARING ON CONTRACT NOTES
SEBI REGISTRATION NO., TRADE NO. AND ORDER NO. NOT INDICATED ON CONTRACT NOTES
PENDING EXECUTION OF THE ORDER AS MANDATORY ACCORDING TO THE REGULATIONS 6(B) OF PFUTP
VIOLATED REGULATION 7 READ WITH CODE OF CONDUCT AS SPECIFIED IN SCHEDULE 11 OF STOCK BROKER REGULATION
EXCEEDED INTRA DAY TRADING LIMITS
DID NOT MAINTAIN RECORD OF CLIENT'S ORDER
DID NOT ACCOUNT FOR MISSING CONTRACT NOTES
DID NOT KEEP PROPER PROPORTION OF CASH & FIXED DEPOSITS FOR CAPITAL ADEQUACY
VIOLATED CODE OF CONDUCT AS PRESCRIBED UNDER STOCK BROKER REGULATIONS
DID NOT MAINTAIN SEGREGATION BETWEEN CLIENTS' SECURITIES AND OWN SECURITIES
MISUSED CLIENTS' FUNDS AND/OR SECURITIES AND/OR ACCOUNTS
|
SUSPENDED REGISTRATION AS STOCK BROKER FROM 01-JAN-2007 TO 30-APR-2007
11-DEC-2006
REACHED SETTLEMENT ( SETTLEMENT CHARGES RS.48,00,000, LEGAL EXPENSES RS.2,00,000 VIDE CONSENT ORDER)
07-DEC-2007
|
SAT: IMPUGNED ORDER SHALL REMAIN STAYED DURING PENDENCY OF THE APPEAL
SAT: ORDER SET ASIDE AS APPLICANT PAID RS.48,00,000 TOWARDS SETTLEMENT CHARGES AND RS.2,00,000 TOWARDS LEGAL EXPENSES AS PER CONSENT ORDER DATED 07/12/2007
|
| 9 |
|
|
SHRIKANT G.MANTRI,M/S
(Member : BSE)
|
|
|
|
SHRIKANT G.MANTRI
|
|
ALLEGED NON-MAINTENANCE OF CONSENT OF CLIENTS IN RESPECT OF CONTRACTS
ALLEGED FAILURE IN ISSUANCE OF CONTRACT NOTES
ALLEGED DELAY IN ISSUANCE OF CONTRACT NOTES
ALLEGED FAILURE TO REPORT OFF-THE-FLOOR TRANSACTIONS
ALLEGED NON-SEGREGATION OF CLIENTS ACCOUNT
ALLEGED FAILURE IN MAINTENANCE OF CERTAIN BOOKS OF ACCOUNTS AND RECORDS SUCH AS ORDER BOOK, MARGIN DEPOSIT BOOK, REGISTER OF ACCOUNT OF SUB BROKER
|
REACHED SETTLEMENT ( SETTLEMENT CHARGES RS.2,00,000 VIDE CONSENT ORDER)
05-FEB-2008
|
|
| The regulatory charges/regulatory actions may be fully or partly applicable to the entities/persons mentioned in the second column. |
