| S.No. |
PERSON |
ENTITY |
REGULATORY CHARGES |
REGULATORY ACTION(S) / DATE OF ORDER |
FURTHER DEVELOPMENTS |
| 181 |
|
VIMAL RAJ MATHUR
(PAN:AIDPM9858P)
|
|
|
|
V.R.MATHUR MASS COMMUNICATIONS LTD.
|
|
FRAUDULENTLY INDUCING PERSONS TO INVEST MONEY
FAILED TO PAY PENALTY
VIOLATED REGULATION 4 OF SEBI (PFUTP) REGULATIONS, 1995
MIS-STATEMENTS IN THE PROSPECTUS
VIOLATED SECTION 13 OF SEBI (MERCHANT BANKERS) REGULATIONS, 1992
VIOLATED SECTION 24 (1) OF SEBI ACT, 1992
|
PROSECUTION LAUNCHED
15-MAY-2006
|
ENTIRE PENALTY AMOUNT ALONG WITH INTEREST AND OTHER CHARGES HAS BEEN PAID BY THE ACCUSED AND THEREFORE, THE MATTER IS COMPOUNDED
IN C.C.144/01 ACCUSED NO.2 WAS CONVICTED WITH IMPRISONMENT OF 3 MONTH AND FINE OF RS.15000 ACCUSED NO. 1 & 3 WERE CONVICTED AND SENTENCED TO FINE OF RS.15,000 ONLY. ON APPEAL BEFORE SESSIONS COURT THE CASE WAS COMPOUNDED UPON RECOMMENDATION OF COMPANY LAW BOARD ON PAYMENT OF RS.15,000 EACH BY ACCUSED NO.1 TO 3. IN CC NO. 11/2002 (SPLIT UP FROM CC NO 144/2001), THE COURT VIDE ITS ORDER DATED 21.08.2006 CONVICTED ACCUSED NO.4 AND 5 WITH A FINE OF RS.3000 EACH AND ON DEFAULT IMPRISONMENT FOR 3 MONTHS. CASE IS PENDING AGAINST ACCUSED NO.6, SYED MEHDI AS CC NO.90/2001 (SPLIT UP FROM CC NO.144/2001)
|
| 182 |
|
|
VINAYAK R.SURVE
|
|
|
|
INDO-FRENCH BIO-TECH ENTERPRISES LTD.
|
|
MIS-STATEMENTS IN THE PROSPECTUS
|
PROSECUTION LAUNCHED
15-MAY-2006
|
THE OFFENCE WAS COMPOUNDED
|
| 183 |
|
|
VINEET JAIN TIJARIA
(PAN:ABTPJ8166C)
|
|
|
|
TIJARIA POLYPIPES LTD.
PAN:AACCT4796M
|
|
DID NOT MAKE DISCLOSURE OF BOARD RESOLUTION DATED 10/09/2011 TO RAISE FUNDS THROUGH ICDS IN PROSPECTUS
DID NOT MAKE DISCLOSURE OF FUNDS RAISED BY TPL THROUGH ICDS IN NATURE OF BRIDGE LOAN IN PROSPECTUS
DID NOT MAKE DISCLOSURE OF FUNDS RAISED THROUGH ICDS PRIOR TO BOARD RESOLUTION DATED 10/09/2011 IN PROSPECTUS
MADE WRONG DISCLOSURE/MISSTATEMENT IN RELATION TO PROCUREMENT OF PLANT & MACHINERY (IMPORTED & INDIGENOUS) AND SUPPLIERS
MADE MIS-STATEMENTS IN PROSPECTUS BY OVERSTATING EXPENDITURE
|
PROHIBITED FROM RAISING ANY FURTHER CAPITAL IN ANY MANNER, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY FROM 28-NOV-2011 TO 27-NOV-2018
DEBARRED/RESTRAINED FROM BUYING/SELLING/DEALING/IPOS IN SECURITIES/SPECIFIED SCRIPS DIRECTLY/INDIRECTLY FROM 28-NOV-2011 TO 27-NOV-2018
20-JUN-2014
|
SAT: SAT VIDE ITS ORDER DATED 29/06/2016 REDUCED DEBARMENT FROM SECURITIES MARKET FOR 7 YEARS TO 5 YEARS. CALLING BACK MONEY FROM ENTITIES TO WHOM THE IPO PROCEEDS HAVE BEEN USED TO REFUND ICDS CANNOT BE SUSTAINED AS IT IS FOUND THAT THESE ENTITIES DID IN FACT MAKE PAYMENTS TO TPL AND REFUND OF MONEY TO THOSE COMPANIES CANNOT BE CALLED BACK. NO COSTS
|
| 184 |
|
|
VINOD SHAH
|
|
|
|
JALTARANG MOTELS LTD.
|
|
VIOLATED SECTION 24 OF SEBI ACT, 1992
VIOLATED SECTION 11 OF SEBI ACT, 1992
MIS-STATEMENTS IN THE PROSPECTUS
DID NOT REPAY EXCESS SHARE APPLICATION MONEY WITHIN STIPULATED PERIOD
INDULGED IN CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT AN OFFENCE (SECTION 120B – IPC)
|
PROSECUTION LAUNCHED
15-MAY-2006
|
|
| 185 |
|
|
W.R.CHATLY
|
|
|
|
SHREE DEWAN STEELS (INDIA) LTD.
|
|
MIS-STATEMENTS IN THE PROSPECTUS
|
LAUNCHED CRIMINAL PROSECUTION
06-APR-1998
|
|
| 186 |
|
|
WALAITY RAM CHATLY
|
|
|
|
SHREE DEWAN STEELS (INDIA) LTD.
|
|
MIS-STATEMENTS IN THE PROSPECTUS
FRAUDULENTLY INDUCING PERSONS TO INVEST MONEY
|
PROSECUTION LAUNCHED
15-MAY-2006
|
ACCUSED NO. 4 AND 5 ARE DISCHARGED BY THE TRIAL COURT ON THE GROUND THAT SEBI FAILED TO PROVE THAT THERE WAS ANY AUTHORIZATION BY A4&5 FOR THE PROSPECTUS OR THERE WAS ANY SIGNATURE ON THE PROSPECTUS
|
| The regulatory charges/regulatory actions may be fully or partly applicable to the entities/persons mentioned in the second column. |
| |
|
|
| Page 10 of 10
|
