S.No.
|
ENTITY |
PERSONS |
REGULATORY CHARGES
|
REGULATORY ACTION(S) / DATE OF ORDER
|
FURTHER DEVELOPMENTS
|
1
|
|
BANK OF RAJASTHAN LTD.,THE
|
|
|
VIOLATED SUB-SECTION (1) OF SECTION 35A OF BANKING REGULATION ACT, 1949
DELETED RECORDS IN BANK’S IT SYSTEMS
DID NOT ADHERE TO ANTI MONEY LAUNDERING (AML) DIRECTIVES/INSTRUCTIONS/GUIDELINES
DID NOT PROVIDE CERTAIN DOCUMENTS SOUGHT BY RBI AND MISREPRESENTED THAT SUCH DOCUMENTS WERE NOT AVAILABLE
IRREGULARITIES IN CONDUCT OF ACCOUNTS OF A CORPORATE GROUP
ALLOWED OPERATIONS AND DID NOT CLOSE SEVERAL ACCOUNTS OPEN USING OTP BASED E-KYC IN NON-FACE-TO-FACE MODE, EVEN AFTER EXPIRY OF ONE YEAR WITHOUT CONDUCTING CUSTOMER DUE DILIGENCE PROCEDURE
|
IMPOSED PENALTY RS.25,00,000
25-FEB-2010
|
|
2
|
|
DHANLAXMI BANK LTD.
|
|
|
ALLOWED OPERATIONS AND DID NOT CLOSE SEVERAL ACCOUNTS OPEN USING OTP BASED E-KYC IN NON-FACE-TO-FACE MODE, EVEN AFTER EXPIRY OF ONE YEAR WITHOUT CONDUCTING CUSTOMER DUE DILIGENCE PROCEDURE
DID NOT ADHERE TO ANTI MONEY LAUNDERING (AML) DIRECTIVES/INSTRUCTIONS/GUIDELINES
|
IMPOSED PENALTY RS.1,00,00,000
05-NOV-2015
|
|
3
|
|
FEDERAL BANK LTD.,THE
|
|
|
DID NOT ADHERE TO DIRECTIVES/INSTRUCTIONS/GUIDELINES OF RBI ON CREATION OF CENTRAL REPOSITORY OF LARGE COMMON EXPOSURES - ACROSS BANKS READ WITH CENTRAL REPOSITORY OF INFORMATION ON LARGE CREDITS (CRILC) – REVISION IN REPORTING
DID NOT ADHERE TO THE DIRECTIVES/INSTRUCTIONS/GUIDELINES OF RBI ON REPORTING OF ASSESSMENT UNDER RBS
DID NOT ADHERE TO THE DIRECTIVES/INSTRUCTIONS/GUIDELINES OF RBI ON PAYMENT OF COMPENSATION FOR DELAY IN RESOLUTION OF ATM-RELATED CUSTOMER COMPLAINTS
ALLOWED OPERATIONS AND DID NOT CLOSE SEVERAL ACCOUNTS OPEN USING OTP BASED E-KYC IN NON-FACE-TO-FACE MODE, EVEN AFTER EXPIRY OF ONE YEAR WITHOUT CONDUCTING CUSTOMER DUE DILIGENCE PROCEDURE
DID NOT ADHERE TO ANTI MONEY LAUNDERING (AML) DIRECTIVES/INSTRUCTIONS/GUIDELINES
|
IMPOSED PENALTY RS.5,00,00,000
25-SEP-2018
|
|
4
|
|
HDFC BANK LTD.
|
|
|
ALLOWED OPERATIONS AND DID NOT CLOSE SEVERAL ACCOUNTS OPEN USING OTP BASED E-KYC IN NON-FACE-TO-FACE MODE, EVEN AFTER EXPIRY OF ONE YEAR WITHOUT CONDUCTING CUSTOMER DUE DILIGENCE PROCEDURE
DID NOT ADHERE TO ANTI MONEY LAUNDERING (AML) DIRECTIVES/INSTRUCTIONS/GUIDELINES
DID NOT REPORT FRAUDS TO RBI
|
IMPOSED PENALTY RS.1,00,00,000
13-JUN-2019
|
|
5
|
|
HDFC BANK LTD.
|
|
|
ALLOWED OPERATIONS AND DID NOT CLOSE SEVERAL ACCOUNTS OPEN USING OTP BASED E-KYC IN NON-FACE-TO-FACE MODE, EVEN AFTER EXPIRY OF ONE YEAR WITHOUT CONDUCTING CUSTOMER DUE DILIGENCE PROCEDURE
DID NOT ADHERE TO ANTI MONEY LAUNDERING (AML) DIRECTIVES/INSTRUCTIONS/GUIDELINES
|
IMPOSED PENALTY RS.20,00,000
04-FEB-2019
|
|
6
|
|
ICICI BANK LTD.
|
|
|
ALLOWED OPERATIONS AND DID NOT CLOSE SEVERAL ACCOUNTS OPEN USING OTP BASED E-KYC IN NON-FACE-TO-FACE MODE, EVEN AFTER EXPIRY OF ONE YEAR WITHOUT CONDUCTING CUSTOMER DUE DILIGENCE PROCEDURE
DID NOT ADHERE TO ANTI MONEY LAUNDERING (AML) DIRECTIVES/INSTRUCTIONS/GUIDELINES
|
IMPOSED PENALTY RS.30,00,000
09-OCT-2012
|
|
7
|
|
ICICI BANK LTD.
|
|
|
DID NOT ADHERE TO ANTI MONEY LAUNDERING (AML) DIRECTIVES/INSTRUCTIONS/GUIDELINES
|
IMPOSED PENALTY RS.5,00,000
30-JUL-2010
|
|
8
|
|
ING VYSYA BANK LTD.
|
|
|
ALLOWED OPERATIONS AND DID NOT CLOSE SEVERAL ACCOUNTS OPEN USING OTP BASED E-KYC IN NON-FACE-TO-FACE MODE, EVEN AFTER EXPIRY OF ONE YEAR WITHOUT CONDUCTING CUSTOMER DUE DILIGENCE PROCEDURE
DID NOT ADHERE TO ANTI MONEY LAUNDERING (AML) DIRECTIVES/INSTRUCTIONS/GUIDELINES
|
IMPOSED PENALTY RS.55,00,000
09-OCT-2012
|
|
9
|
|
JAMMU & KASHMIR BANK LTD.,THE
|
|
|
DID NOT ADHERE TO DIRECTIVES/INSTRUCTIONS/GUIDELINES OF RBI ON INCOME RECOGNITION AND ASSET CLASSIFICATION (IRAC) NORMS AND FRAUDS
ALLOWED OPERATIONS AND DID NOT CLOSE SEVERAL ACCOUNTS OPEN USING OTP BASED E-KYC IN NON-FACE-TO-FACE MODE, EVEN AFTER EXPIRY OF ONE YEAR WITHOUT CONDUCTING CUSTOMER DUE DILIGENCE PROCEDURE
DID NOT ADHERE TO ANTI MONEY LAUNDERING (AML) DIRECTIVES/INSTRUCTIONS/GUIDELINES
|
IMPOSED PENALTY RS.3,00,00,000
05-NOV-2018
|
|
10
|
|
KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD.
|
|
|
ALLOWED OPERATIONS AND DID NOT CLOSE SEVERAL ACCOUNTS OPEN USING OTP BASED E-KYC IN NON-FACE-TO-FACE MODE, EVEN AFTER EXPIRY OF ONE YEAR WITHOUT CONDUCTING CUSTOMER DUE DILIGENCE PROCEDURE
DID NOT ADHERE TO ANTI MONEY LAUNDERING (AML) DIRECTIVES/INSTRUCTIONS/GUIDELINES
|
IMPOSED PENALTY RS.20,00,000
04-FEB-2019
|
|
The regulatory charges/regulatory actions may be fully or partly applicable to the entities/persons mentioned in the second column.
|