S.No.
|
ENTITY |
PERSONS |
REGULATORY CHARGES
|
REGULATORY ACTION(S) / DATE OF ORDER
|
FURTHER DEVELOPMENTS
|
1
|
|
AXIS BANK LTD.
|
|
|
DID NOT ADHERE TO DIRECTIVES/INSTRUCTIONS/GUIDELINES OF RBI ON LOANS AND ADVANCES–STATUTORY AND OTHER RESTRICTIONS
DID NOT ADHERE TO DIRECTIVES/INSTRUCTIONS/GUIDELINES ISSUED BY RBI ON FINANCIAL SERVICES PROVIDED BY BANKS
ALLOWED OPERATIONS AND DID NOT CLOSE SEVERAL ACCOUNTS OPEN USING OTP BASED E-KYC IN NON-FACE-TO-FACE MODE, EVEN AFTER EXPIRY OF ONE YEAR WITHOUT CONDUCTING CUSTOMER DUE DILIGENCE PROCEDURE
DID NOT ADHERE TO DIRECTIVES/INSTRUCTIONS/GUIDELINES OF RBI ON LEVY OF PENAL CHARGES ON NON-MAINTENANCE OF MINIMUM BALANCES IN SAVINGS BANK ACCOUNTS
|
IMPOSED PENALTY RS.93,00,000
07-APR-2022
|
|
2
|
|
AXIS BANK LTD.
|
|
|
ALLOWED OPERATIONS AND DID NOT CLOSE SEVERAL ACCOUNTS OPEN USING OTP BASED E-KYC IN NON-FACE-TO-FACE MODE, EVEN AFTER EXPIRY OF ONE YEAR WITHOUT CONDUCTING CUSTOMER DUE DILIGENCE PROCEDURE
|
IMPOSED PENALTY RS.25,00,000
01-SEP-2021
|
|
3
|
|
AXIS BANK LTD.
|
|
|
ALLOWED OPERATIONS AND DID NOT CLOSE SEVERAL ACCOUNTS OPEN USING OTP BASED E-KYC IN NON-FACE-TO-FACE MODE, EVEN AFTER EXPIRY OF ONE YEAR WITHOUT CONDUCTING CUSTOMER DUE DILIGENCE PROCEDURE
DID NOT OBSERVE CERTAIN SAFEGUARDS IN RESPECT OF ARRANGEMENT OF “AT PAR” PAYMENT OF CHEQUES DRAWN BY CO-OPERATIVE BANKS
DID NOT ADHERE TO DIRECTIVES/INSTRUCTIONS/GUIDELINES ON KYC COMPLIANCE FOR WALK-IN CUSTOMERS INCLUDING FOR SALE OF THIRD PARTY PRODUCTS
DID NOT FILE CASH TRANSACTION REPORTS (CTRS) IN RESPECT OF SOME CASH TRANSACTIONS, SALE OF GOLD COINS FOR CASH BEYOND RS. 50,000
DID NOT OBTAIN PERMANENT ACCOUNT NUMBER (PAN) CARD DETAILS OR FORM 60/61
DID NOT VERIFY SOURCE OF FUNDS CREDITED TO FEW NON-RESIDENT ORDINARY (NRO) ACCOUNTS
DID NOT RE-DESIGNATE FEW ACCOUNTS AS NRO ACCOUNTS
|
IMPOSED PENALTY RS.5,00,10,000
10-JUN-2013
|
|
4
|
|
BANK OF RAJASTHAN LTD.,THE
|
|
|
VIOLATED SUB-SECTION (1) OF SECTION 35A OF BANKING REGULATION ACT, 1949
DELETED RECORDS IN BANK’S IT SYSTEMS
DID NOT ADHERE TO ANTI MONEY LAUNDERING (AML) DIRECTIVES/INSTRUCTIONS/GUIDELINES
DID NOT PROVIDE CERTAIN DOCUMENTS SOUGHT BY RBI AND MISREPRESENTED THAT SUCH DOCUMENTS WERE NOT AVAILABLE
IRREGULARITIES IN CONDUCT OF ACCOUNTS OF A CORPORATE GROUP
ALLOWED OPERATIONS AND DID NOT CLOSE SEVERAL ACCOUNTS OPEN USING OTP BASED E-KYC IN NON-FACE-TO-FACE MODE, EVEN AFTER EXPIRY OF ONE YEAR WITHOUT CONDUCTING CUSTOMER DUE DILIGENCE PROCEDURE
|
IMPOSED PENALTY RS.25,00,000
25-FEB-2010
|
|
5
|
|
CATHOLIC SYRIAN BANK LTD.,THE
|
|
|
ALLOWED OPERATIONS AND DID NOT CLOSE SEVERAL ACCOUNTS OPEN USING OTP BASED E-KYC IN NON-FACE-TO-FACE MODE, EVEN AFTER EXPIRY OF ONE YEAR WITHOUT CONDUCTING CUSTOMER DUE DILIGENCE PROCEDURE
BANK’S CONTROL SYSTEMS FAILED IN DETECTING IRREGULARITIES
|
IMPOSED PENALTY RS.10,00,000
26-JUL-2007
|
|
6
|
|
CENTURION BANK OF PUNJAB LTD.
|
|
|
ALLOWED OPERATIONS AND DID NOT CLOSE SEVERAL ACCOUNTS OPEN USING OTP BASED E-KYC IN NON-FACE-TO-FACE MODE, EVEN AFTER EXPIRY OF ONE YEAR WITHOUT CONDUCTING CUSTOMER DUE DILIGENCE PROCEDURE
VIOLATED DIRECTIVES/INSTRUCTIONS/GUIDELINES OF RBI ON IPO FINANCING
|
IMPOSED PENALTY RS.15,00,000
01-JUN-2006
|
|
7
|
|
DEVELOPMENT CREDIT BANK LTD.
|
|
|
ALLOWED OPERATIONS AND DID NOT CLOSE SEVERAL ACCOUNTS OPEN USING OTP BASED E-KYC IN NON-FACE-TO-FACE MODE, EVEN AFTER EXPIRY OF ONE YEAR WITHOUT CONDUCTING CUSTOMER DUE DILIGENCE PROCEDURE
DID NOT ADHERE TO DIRECTIVES/INSTRUCTIONS/GUIDELINES ON KYC COMPLIANCE FOR WALK-IN CUSTOMERS INCLUDING FOR SALE OF THIRD PARTY PRODUCTS
DID NOT FILE CASH TRANSACTION REPORTS (CTRS) IN RESPECT OF SOME CASH TRANSACTIONS, SALE OF GOLD COINS FOR CASH BEYOND RS. 50,000
DID NOT ADHERE TO INSTRUCTIONS ON MONITORING OF TRANSACTIONS IN CUSTOMER ACCOUNTS
DID NOT ADHERE TO INSTRUCTIONS ON CLASSIFICATION OF ACCOUNTS AS ‘IN-OPERATIVE’/DORMANT AND LAPSES IN MONITORING OF TRANSACTIONS IN DORMANT ACCOUNTS
DID NOT ADHERE TO INSTRUCTIONS WHICH PROHIBITS ACCEPTANCE OF CASH ABOVE RS.50, 000 FOR SALE OF GOLD COINS AND ISSUE OF DEMAND DRAFTS ETC.
DID NOT ADHERE TO INSTRUCTIONS ON UPPER LIMIT FOR REMITTANCES UNDER LIBERALISED REMITTANCE SCHEME
DID NOT ADHERE TO INSTRUCTIONS ON UPPER LIMIT FOR REPATRIATION OF FUNDS FROM NON RESIDENT ORDINARY (NRO) ACCOUNTS
DID NOT ADHERE TO INSTRUCTIONS ON IMPORT OF GOLD ON CONSIGNMENT BASIS
|
IMPOSED PENALTY RS.1,00,00,000
15-JUL-2013
|
|
8
|
|
DHANLAXMI BANK LTD.
|
|
|
ALLOWED OPERATIONS AND DID NOT CLOSE SEVERAL ACCOUNTS OPEN USING OTP BASED E-KYC IN NON-FACE-TO-FACE MODE, EVEN AFTER EXPIRY OF ONE YEAR WITHOUT CONDUCTING CUSTOMER DUE DILIGENCE PROCEDURE
DID NOT ADHERE TO ANTI MONEY LAUNDERING (AML) DIRECTIVES/INSTRUCTIONS/GUIDELINES
|
IMPOSED PENALTY RS.1,00,00,000
05-NOV-2015
|
|
9
|
|
DHANLAXMI BANK LTD.
|
|
|
ALLOWED OPERATIONS AND DID NOT CLOSE SEVERAL ACCOUNTS OPEN USING OTP BASED E-KYC IN NON-FACE-TO-FACE MODE, EVEN AFTER EXPIRY OF ONE YEAR WITHOUT CONDUCTING CUSTOMER DUE DILIGENCE PROCEDURE
DID NOT ADHERE TO DIRECTIVES/INSTRUCTIONS/GUIDELINES ON KYC COMPLIANCE FOR WALK-IN CUSTOMERS INCLUDING FOR SALE OF THIRD PARTY PRODUCTS
DID NOT FILE CASH TRANSACTION REPORTS (CTRS) IN RESPECT OF SOME CASH TRANSACTIONS, SALE OF GOLD COINS FOR CASH BEYOND RS. 50,000
DID NOT ADHERE TO INSTRUCTIONS ON MONITORING OF TRANSACTIONS IN CUSTOMER ACCOUNTS
DID NOT ADHERE TO INSTRUCTIONS ON CLASSIFICATION OF ACCOUNTS AS ‘IN-OPERATIVE’/DORMANT AND LAPSES IN MONITORING OF TRANSACTIONS IN DORMANT ACCOUNTS
DID NOT ADHERE TO INSTRUCTIONS WHICH PROHIBITS ACCEPTANCE OF CASH ABOVE RS.50, 000 FOR SALE OF GOLD COINS AND ISSUE OF DEMAND DRAFTS ETC.
DID NOT ADHERE TO INSTRUCTIONS ON UPPER LIMIT FOR REMITTANCES UNDER LIBERALISED REMITTANCE SCHEME
DID NOT ADHERE TO INSTRUCTIONS ON UPPER LIMIT FOR REPATRIATION OF FUNDS FROM NON RESIDENT ORDINARY (NRO) ACCOUNTS
DID NOT ADHERE TO INSTRUCTIONS ON IMPORT OF GOLD ON CONSIGNMENT BASIS
|
IMPOSED PENALTY RS.2,00,00,000
15-JUL-2013
|
|
10
|
|
FEDERAL BANK LTD.,THE
|
|
|
DID NOT ADHERE TO DIRECTIVES/INSTRUCTIONS/GUIDELINES OF RBI ON CREATION OF CENTRAL REPOSITORY OF LARGE COMMON EXPOSURES - ACROSS BANKS READ WITH CENTRAL REPOSITORY OF INFORMATION ON LARGE CREDITS (CRILC) – REVISION IN REPORTING
DID NOT ADHERE TO THE DIRECTIVES/INSTRUCTIONS/GUIDELINES OF RBI ON REPORTING OF ASSESSMENT UNDER RBS
DID NOT ADHERE TO THE DIRECTIVES/INSTRUCTIONS/GUIDELINES OF RBI ON PAYMENT OF COMPENSATION FOR DELAY IN RESOLUTION OF ATM-RELATED CUSTOMER COMPLAINTS
ALLOWED OPERATIONS AND DID NOT CLOSE SEVERAL ACCOUNTS OPEN USING OTP BASED E-KYC IN NON-FACE-TO-FACE MODE, EVEN AFTER EXPIRY OF ONE YEAR WITHOUT CONDUCTING CUSTOMER DUE DILIGENCE PROCEDURE
DID NOT ADHERE TO ANTI MONEY LAUNDERING (AML) DIRECTIVES/INSTRUCTIONS/GUIDELINES
|
IMPOSED PENALTY RS.5,00,00,000
25-SEP-2018
|
|
11
|
|
FEDERAL BANK LTD.,THE
|
|
|
ALLOWED OPERATIONS AND DID NOT CLOSE SEVERAL ACCOUNTS OPEN USING OTP BASED E-KYC IN NON-FACE-TO-FACE MODE, EVEN AFTER EXPIRY OF ONE YEAR WITHOUT CONDUCTING CUSTOMER DUE DILIGENCE PROCEDURE
DID NOT ADHERE TO DIRECTIVES/INSTRUCTIONS/GUIDELINES ON KYC COMPLIANCE FOR WALK-IN CUSTOMERS INCLUDING FOR SALE OF THIRD PARTY PRODUCTS
DID NOT FILE CASH TRANSACTION REPORTS (CTRS) IN RESPECT OF SOME CASH TRANSACTIONS, SALE OF GOLD COINS FOR CASH BEYOND RS. 50,000
DID NOT ADHERE TO INSTRUCTIONS ON MONITORING OF TRANSACTIONS IN CUSTOMER ACCOUNTS
DID NOT ADHERE TO INSTRUCTIONS ON CLASSIFICATION OF ACCOUNTS AS ‘IN-OPERATIVE’/DORMANT AND LAPSES IN MONITORING OF TRANSACTIONS IN DORMANT ACCOUNTS
DID NOT ADHERE TO INSTRUCTIONS WHICH PROHIBITS ACCEPTANCE OF CASH ABOVE RS.50, 000 FOR SALE OF GOLD COINS AND ISSUE OF DEMAND DRAFTS ETC.
DID NOT ADHERE TO INSTRUCTIONS ON UPPER LIMIT FOR REMITTANCES UNDER LIBERALISED REMITTANCE SCHEME
DID NOT ADHERE TO INSTRUCTIONS ON UPPER LIMIT FOR REPATRIATION OF FUNDS FROM NON RESIDENT ORDINARY (NRO) ACCOUNTS
DID NOT ADHERE TO INSTRUCTIONS ON IMPORT OF GOLD ON CONSIGNMENT BASIS
|
IMPOSED PENALTY RS.3,00,00,000
15-JUL-2013
|
|
12
|
|
HDFC BANK LTD.
|
|
|
ALLOWED OPERATIONS AND DID NOT CLOSE SEVERAL ACCOUNTS OPEN USING OTP BASED E-KYC IN NON-FACE-TO-FACE MODE, EVEN AFTER EXPIRY OF ONE YEAR WITHOUT CONDUCTING CUSTOMER DUE DILIGENCE PROCEDURE
|
IMPOSED PENALTY RS.1,00,00,000
29-JAN-2020
|
|
13
|
|
HDFC BANK LTD.
|
|
|
ALLOWED OPERATIONS AND DID NOT CLOSE SEVERAL ACCOUNTS OPEN USING OTP BASED E-KYC IN NON-FACE-TO-FACE MODE, EVEN AFTER EXPIRY OF ONE YEAR WITHOUT CONDUCTING CUSTOMER DUE DILIGENCE PROCEDURE
DID NOT ADHERE TO ANTI MONEY LAUNDERING (AML) DIRECTIVES/INSTRUCTIONS/GUIDELINES
DID NOT REPORT FRAUDS TO RBI
|
IMPOSED PENALTY RS.1,00,00,000
13-JUN-2019
|
|
14
|
|
HDFC BANK LTD.
|
|
|
ALLOWED OPERATIONS AND DID NOT CLOSE SEVERAL ACCOUNTS OPEN USING OTP BASED E-KYC IN NON-FACE-TO-FACE MODE, EVEN AFTER EXPIRY OF ONE YEAR WITHOUT CONDUCTING CUSTOMER DUE DILIGENCE PROCEDURE
DID NOT ADHERE TO ANTI MONEY LAUNDERING (AML) DIRECTIVES/INSTRUCTIONS/GUIDELINES
|
IMPOSED PENALTY RS.20,00,000
04-FEB-2019
|
|
15
|
|
HDFC BANK LTD.
|
|
|
ALLOWED OPERATIONS AND DID NOT CLOSE SEVERAL ACCOUNTS OPEN USING OTP BASED E-KYC IN NON-FACE-TO-FACE MODE, EVEN AFTER EXPIRY OF ONE YEAR WITHOUT CONDUCTING CUSTOMER DUE DILIGENCE PROCEDURE
DID NOT ADHERE TO DIRECTIVES/INSTRUCTIONS/GUIDELINES OF RISK CATEGORIZATION OF ACCOUNTS
DID NOT ADHERE TO INSTRUCTIONS ON MONITORING OF TRANSACTIONS IN CUSTOMER ACCOUNTS
DID NOT ADHERE TO INSTRUCTIONS TO FILE STRS
DID NOT ADHERE TO DIRECTIVES/INSTRUCTIONS/GUIDELINES OF FEMA
|
IMPOSED PENALTY RS.2,00,00,000
27-JUL-2016
|
|
16
|
|
HDFC BANK LTD.
|
|
|
ALLOWED OPERATIONS AND DID NOT CLOSE SEVERAL ACCOUNTS OPEN USING OTP BASED E-KYC IN NON-FACE-TO-FACE MODE, EVEN AFTER EXPIRY OF ONE YEAR WITHOUT CONDUCTING CUSTOMER DUE DILIGENCE PROCEDURE
DID NOT OBSERVE CERTAIN SAFEGUARDS IN RESPECT OF ARRANGEMENT OF “AT PAR” PAYMENT OF CHEQUES DRAWN BY CO-OPERATIVE BANKS
DID NOT ADHERE TO DIRECTIVES/INSTRUCTIONS/GUIDELINES ON KYC COMPLIANCE FOR WALK-IN CUSTOMERS INCLUDING FOR SALE OF THIRD PARTY PRODUCTS
DID NOT FILE CASH TRANSACTION REPORTS (CTRS) IN RESPECT OF SOME CASH TRANSACTIONS, SALE OF GOLD COINS FOR CASH BEYOND RS. 50,000
DID NOT OBTAIN PERMANENT ACCOUNT NUMBER (PAN) CARD DETAILS OR FORM 60/61
DID NOT VERIFY SOURCE OF FUNDS CREDITED TO FEW NON-RESIDENT ORDINARY (NRO) ACCOUNTS
DID NOT RE-DESIGNATE FEW ACCOUNTS AS NRO ACCOUNTS
|
IMPOSED PENALTY RS.4,50,00,000
10-JUN-2013
|
|
17
|
|
ICICI BANK LTD.
|
|
|
ALLOWED OPERATIONS AND DID NOT CLOSE SEVERAL ACCOUNTS OPEN USING OTP BASED E-KYC IN NON-FACE-TO-FACE MODE, EVEN AFTER EXPIRY OF ONE YEAR WITHOUT CONDUCTING CUSTOMER DUE DILIGENCE PROCEDURE
DID NOT ADHERE TO INSTRUCTIONS ON MONITORING OF TRANSACTIONS IN CUSTOMER ACCOUNTS
|
IMPOSED PENALTY RS.50,00,000
17-DEC-2014
|
|
18
|
|
ICICI BANK LTD.
|
|
|
ALLOWED OPERATIONS AND DID NOT CLOSE SEVERAL ACCOUNTS OPEN USING OTP BASED E-KYC IN NON-FACE-TO-FACE MODE, EVEN AFTER EXPIRY OF ONE YEAR WITHOUT CONDUCTING CUSTOMER DUE DILIGENCE PROCEDURE
DID NOT OBSERVE CERTAIN SAFEGUARDS IN RESPECT OF ARRANGEMENT OF “AT PAR” PAYMENT OF CHEQUES DRAWN BY CO-OPERATIVE BANKS
DID NOT ADHERE TO DIRECTIVES/INSTRUCTIONS/GUIDELINES ON KYC COMPLIANCE FOR WALK-IN CUSTOMERS INCLUDING FOR SALE OF THIRD PARTY PRODUCTS
DID NOT FILE CASH TRANSACTION REPORTS (CTRS) IN RESPECT OF SOME CASH TRANSACTIONS, SALE OF GOLD COINS FOR CASH BEYOND RS. 50,000
DID NOT OBTAIN PERMANENT ACCOUNT NUMBER (PAN) CARD DETAILS OR FORM 60/61
DID NOT VERIFY SOURCE OF FUNDS CREDITED TO FEW NON-RESIDENT ORDINARY (NRO) ACCOUNTS
DID NOT RE-DESIGNATE FEW ACCOUNTS AS NRO ACCOUNTS
|
IMPOSED PENALTY RS.1,00,10,000
10-JUN-2013
|
|
19
|
|
ICICI BANK LTD.
|
|
|
ALLOWED OPERATIONS AND DID NOT CLOSE SEVERAL ACCOUNTS OPEN USING OTP BASED E-KYC IN NON-FACE-TO-FACE MODE, EVEN AFTER EXPIRY OF ONE YEAR WITHOUT CONDUCTING CUSTOMER DUE DILIGENCE PROCEDURE
DID NOT ADHERE TO ANTI MONEY LAUNDERING (AML) DIRECTIVES/INSTRUCTIONS/GUIDELINES
|
IMPOSED PENALTY RS.30,00,000
09-OCT-2012
|
|
20
|
|
IDBI LTD.
|
|
|
ALLOWED OPERATIONS AND DID NOT CLOSE SEVERAL ACCOUNTS OPEN USING OTP BASED E-KYC IN NON-FACE-TO-FACE MODE, EVEN AFTER EXPIRY OF ONE YEAR WITHOUT CONDUCTING CUSTOMER DUE DILIGENCE PROCEDURE
VIOLATED DIRECTIVES/INSTRUCTIONS/GUIDELINES OF RBI ON IPO FINANCING
VIOLATED DIRECTIVES/INSTRUCTIONS/GUIDELINES OF RBI ON OPENING OF ACCOUNTS INCLUDING JOINT ACCOUNTS
|
IMPOSED PENALTY RS.5,00,000
21-AUG-2006
|
|
The regulatory charges/regulatory actions may be fully or partly applicable to the entities/persons mentioned in the second column.
|
|
|
Page
1
of
2
|