If you are an Existing User, please enter your Username & Password below

Forgot Password?


Are you a New User? Click here to enrol

close

Click here to visit old website
Co-Sponsors

SOURCE OF INFORMATION : INSURANCE REGULATORY & DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF INDIA WEBSITE
PERIOD COVERED : 16-AUG-2002 TO 21-NOV-2024

NAMES IN BROWN COLOUR
Names of entities/persons in brown colour denote that the regulatory order is not against them but their names have been mentioned only for association purposes.

INSURANCE COMPANY: VIOLATED IRDA (PROTECTION OF POLICYHOLDERS’ INTERESTS) REGULATIONS, 2002

S.No. ENTITY  PERSONS  REGULATORY CHARGES REGULATORY ACTION(S) / DATE OF ORDER FURTHER DEVELOPMENTS
1
History of entity/person BHARTI AXA GENERAL INSURANCE CO.LTD.  
  MADE CHANGES IN HEALTH INSURANCE POLICY VIOLATING FILE AND USE DIRECTIVES/INSTRUCTIONS/GUIDELINES

MADE PROPORTIONATE DEDUCTION IN PROPORTION TO ROOM RENT AND DEDUCTED DMO/RMO CHARGES WITHOUT MAKING PROPER DISCLOSURE TO POLICYHOLDERS  
IMPOSED PENALTY RS.5,00,000

20-JUL-2016
 
2
History of entity/person BHARTI AXA GENERAL INSURANCE CO.LTD.  
  MADE PAYMENTS TOWARDS INFRASTRUCTURE EXPENSES TO CORPORATE AGENTS

PROCURED BUSINESS THROUGH UNLICENSED ENTITIES

PAID COMMISSION TO UNAUTHORISED PERSONS/ENTITIES

MADE ADDITIONAL PAYMENTS OTHER THAN COMMISSION AMOUNT TO LICENSED ENTITY

DID NOT PROVIDE INFORMATION TO INSPECTION TEAM

ALLOWED DISCOUNTS/DISCRETIONARY DISCOUNTS OVER AND ABOVE APPROVED STRUCTURE

DID NOT PROVIDE FULL INFORMATION ON PERILS COVERED TOWARDS WHICH THE PREMIUM HAS BEEN COLLECTED AND DID NOT PROVIDE DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE NOR REPLIED IN ANY OF ITS SUBMISSIONS VIOLATING PROVISIONS OF IRDA (PROTECTION OF POLICYHOLDERS’ INTERESTS) REGULATIONS, 2002  
IMPOSED PENALTY RS.35,00,000

09-AUG-2016
 
3
History of entity/person CHOLAMANDALAM MS GENERAL INSURANCE CO.LTD.  
  DID NOT REPORT TO INSPECTION OBSERVATION ON INDIVIDUAL REFERRALS WHO ARE ALSO AGENTS OF OTHER INSURERS

MADE HIGHER DISCOUNTS IN PREMIUM IN EXCESS OF MAXIMUM DISCOUNT ALLOWED UNDER MOTOR ,ENGINEERING AND TRAVEL POLICIES

ISSUED SPECIAL CONTINGENCY POLICY WITHOUT FILING AND TAKING APPROVAL FROM AUTHORITY

DID NOT PLACE SYSTEM CONTROLS TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE VIOLATING OF SECTION 64-VB OF INSURANCE ACT, 1938

DID NOT MAKE DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION OF ADD-ON COVERS AND PREMIUM BIFURCATION TOWARDS BASE COVER/OPTIONAL OPTED ADD-ON COVERS IN THE POLICY SCHEDULE VIOLATING PROVISIONS OF IRDA (PROTECTION OF POLICYHOLDERS’ INTERESTS) REGULATIONS, 2002  
IMPOSED PENALTY RS.25,00,000

16-DEC-2015
 
4
History of entity/person FUTURE GENERALI INDIA INSURANCE CO.LTD.  
  OFFERED ADD-ON COVER PRIOR TO FILING THE ADD-ON COVER WITH IRDA FOR APPOVAL VIOLATING SECTION 102(B) OF INSURANCE ACT, 1938

OFFERED ADD-ON COVER WITHOUT OBTAINING CONSENT OF POLICYHOLDER VIOLATING REGULATION 3(2) OF IRDA (PROTECTION OF POLICYHOLDERS’ INTERESTS) REGULATIONS, 2002  
IMPOSED PENALTY RS.17,00,000

CENSURED/WARNED & DIRECTED/ADVISED TO BE DILIGENT IN COMPLYING WITH ALL THE ACTS, REGULATIONS ETC.

09-APR-2021
 
5
History of entity/person FUTURE GENERALI INDIA LIFE INSURANCE CO.LTD.  
  PURCHASED GIFT VOUCHERS FROM ONE OF THE GROUP COMPANIES AND DISTRIBUTED IN THE NAME OF BRAND BUILDING ACTIVITY AND RECRUITMENT DRIVE OF POTENTIAL ADVISORS VIOLATING REGULATION 23 (F) OF IRDA (REGISTRATION OF INSURANCE COMPANIES) REGULATIONS, 2000

PROCURED BUSINESS THROUGH UNLICENSED ENTITIES

PAID COMMISSION TO PERSONS, WHICH WERE NOT LICENSED TO SOLICIT BUSINESS

ENGAGED IN SOLICITATION OF INSURANCE BUSINESS THROUGH MULTILEVEL MARKETING MODEL

ALLOWED AN INDIVIDUAL TO ATTEND DUBAI CONVENTION WHO WAS NEITHER TIED AS AGENT NOR APPOINTED AS A SPECIFIED PERSON BY ANY CORPORATE AGENT

DID NOT HAVE PROPER SYSTEM FOR ADMINISTRATION OF GROUP POLICIES  
IMPOSED PENALTY RS.50,00,000

10-JUN-2015
 
6
History of entity/person HDFC ERGO GENERAL INSURANCE CO.LTD.  
  DID NOT ADHERE TO FILE & USE DIRECTIVES/INSTRUCTIONS/GUIDELINES

DID NOT ADHERE TO MOTOR VEHICLE ACT RELATED TO TOTAL LOSS/CONSTRUCTIVE TOTAL LOSS VIOLATING REGULATION 9(5) OF IRDA (PROTECTION OF POLICYHOLDERS’ INTERESTS) REGULATIONS, 2002  
IMPOSED PENALTY RS.5,00,000

05-DEC-2018
 
7
History of entity/person IFFCO-TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO.LTD.  
  DID NOT ADHERE TO FILE & USE DIRECTIVES/INSTRUCTIONS/GUIDELINES

DID NOT ADHERE TO MOTOR VEHICLE ACT RELATED TO TOTAL LOSS/CONSTRUCTIVE TOTAL LOSS VIOLATING REGULATION 9(5) OF IRDA (PROTECTION OF POLICYHOLDERS’ INTERESTS) REGULATIONS, 2002  
IMPOSED PENALTY RS.5,00,000

19-DEC-2018
 
8
History of entity/person INDIAFIRST LIFE INSURANCE CO.LTD.  
  DID NOT ADHERE TO CIRCULAR ISSUED BY IRDA

CREATED DUMMY CODES IN NEW BUSINESS PROCESSING/POLICY ADMINISTRATION SYSTWEMS AND COMMISSION PAID TO RESPECTIVES CORPORATE AGENTS

FLOATED VARIOUS SALES CAMPAIGNS TO THE EMPLOYEES OF CORPORATE AGENTS IN THE NATURE OF "GIFT CARDS", "ONLINE REDEMPTION POINTS" AND “FOREIGN TRIPS" VIOLATING SECTION 40(1) & 40A OF INSURANCE ACT, 1938

PAID AMOUNT OTHER THAN PERMITTED AGENCY COMMISSION TO CORPORATE AGENT

MADE PAYMENT OF DEATH CLAIM PROCEEDS TO MASTER POLICYHOLDER VIOLATING OF CLAUSE C-7 OF GROUP INSURANCE DIRECTIVES/INSTRUCTIONS/GUIDELINES, 2005

LAUNCHED POLICIES WHICH WERE NOT APPROVED BY IRDA VIOLATING FILE AND USE DIRECTIVES/INSTRUCTIONS/GUIDELINES ISSUED BY IRDA

DID NOT OBTAIN CERTIFICATE AT THE END OF THE MEMBERSHIP FORM FROM PROSPECT VIOLATING REGULATION 3(4) & 4(2) OF IRDA (PROTECTION OF POLICYHOLDERS’ INTERESTS) REGULATIONS, 2002  
IMPOSED PENALTY RS.65,00,000

26-MAY-2015
 
9
History of entity/person KOTAK MAHINDRA OLD MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE LTD.  
  CLAIMED UNDER GROUP MASTER POLICY REPUDIATED ON THE GROUNDS OF “NON-DISCLOSURE IN HEALTH DECLARATION” BY INDIVIDUAL MEMBER   IMPOSED PENALTY RS.5,00,000

06-MAY-2016
 
10
History of entity/person L&T GENERAL INSURANCE CO.LTD.  
  PROCURED BUSINESS THROUGH UNLICENSED ENTITIES

MADE CHANGES TO TARIFF WORDINGS WITHOUT FILING AND TAKING APPROVAL FROM IRDA

ALLOWED DISCOUNTS ON FILED RATES ON DIFFERENT BASIS/GROUNDS

DID NOT ADHERE TO RATING & PRICING PROCEDURE NOR THE PREMIUM QUOTATIONS WERE APPROVED BY APPOINTED ACTUARY OR ANY OTHER AUTHROIZED PERSON

SETTLED LESSER CLAIM THAN ELIGIBLE

ACCEPTED PREMIUM FROM THIRD PARTY HAVING NO INSURABLE INTEREST

DID NOT FILE “STANDARDIZED PRODUCT SCRIPTS” IMMEDIATELY ON ENTERING INTO AGREEMENT  
IMPOSED PENALTY RS.50,00,000

30-JUL-2015
 
11
History of entity/person NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO.LTD.,THE  
  PROCURED BUSINESS AND PAID COMMISSION TO AGENTS AFTER EXPIRY OF LICENSE

ALLOWED DISCOUNTS/DISCRETIONARY DISCOUNTS OVER AND ABOVE APPROVED STRUCTURE

DELAY IN APPOINTMENT OF SURVEYORS

DID NOT FOLLOW UP WITH SURVEYORS ON TIMELY SUBMISSION OF REPORT

DELAY IN SETTLEMENT OF CLAIMS AFTER RECEIPT OF SURVEY REPORT  
IMPOSED PENALTY RS.15,00,000

11-MAR-2016
 
12
History of entity/person NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO.LTD.,THE  
  DELAY IN MAKING PAYMENT OF CLAIMS VIOLATING REGULATION 9 OF IRDA (PROTECTION OF POLICYHOLDERS INTERESTS) REGULATIONS, 2002   IMPOSED PENALTY RS.3,00,000

13-SEP-2019
 
13
History of entity/person RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO.LTD.  
  SETTLED LESSER AMOUNTS THAN IDV IN CASE OF MOTOR VEHICLE TOTAL LOSS/THEFT CLAIMS VIOLATING PROVISION 9(5) OF IRDA (PROTECTION OF POLICYHOLDERS’ INTERESTS) REGULATIONS, 2002   IMPOSED PENALTY RS.5,00,000

21-AUG-2018
 
14
History of entity/person RELIANCE NIPPON LIFE INSURANCE CO.LTD.  
  DEDUCTED PROPORTIONATE PREMIUM INSTEAD OF PROPORTIONATE RISK PREMIUM IN FREE LOCK CANCELLATION (FLC) POLICIES VIOLATING IRDAI (PROTECTION OF POLICYHOLDERS’ INTERESTS) REGULATIONS, 2002   IMPOSED PENALTY RS.5,00,000

21-DEC-2017
 
15
History of entity/person ROYAL SUNDARAM ALLIANCE INSURANCE CO.LTD.  
  MADE PAYMENTS TO CORPORATE AGENTS IN ADDITION TO COMMISSION FOR VARIOUS ACTIVITIES

PAID TO AUTO DEALERS IN THE NATURE OF REMUNERATION TOWARDS OUTSOURCING OF PROMOTIONAL AND BRANDING ACTIVITIES

OUTSOURCED CORE ACTIVITIES LIKE ALLOWING THIRD PARTIES TO DECIDE PREMIUM RATES, TO DO SURVEY AND ASSESS LOSS ETC.

DID NOT MAINTAIN SPECIMEN COPIES OF ADVERTISEMENTS

PROCURED BUSINESS THROUGH UNLICENSED ENTITIES

PAID COMMISSION TO OTHER THAN LICENSED AGENTS

MADE CHANGES TO TARIFF WORDINGS WITHOUT FILING AND TAKING APPROVAL FROM IRDA

ALLOWED DISCOUNTS UP TO 90% UNDER ENGINEERING & FIRE SEGMENTS EVEN THOUGH THE MAXIMUM DISCOUNT ALLOWED WAS 60%

ISSUED GROUP PERSONAL ACCIDENT INSURANCE POLICY (GPA) TO PRIMARY CARD HOLDERS WHICH WAS NOT AS PER FILED VERSION OF THE PRODUCT

DID NOT FILE “SUNDARAM CREDIT PROTECT” WITH IRDA AS PER FILE AND USE DIRECTIVES/INSTRUCTIONS/GUIDELINES

ISSUED UNNAMED POLICY COVERING MEMBERS OF INSURED  
IMPOSED PENALTY RS.40,00,000

06-MAY-2016
 
16
History of entity/person ROYAL SUNDARAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO.LTD.  
  DID NOT ADHERE TO FILE & USE DIRECTIVES/INSTRUCTIONS/GUIDELINES

DID NOT ADHERE TO MOTOR VEHICLE ACT RELATED TO TOTAL LOSS/CONSTRUCTIVE TOTAL LOSS VIOLATING REGULATION 9(5) OF IRDA (PROTECTION OF POLICYHOLDERS’ INTERESTS) REGULATIONS, 2002  
IMPOSED PENALTY RS.5,00,000

19-DEC-2018
 
17
History of entity/person SBI LIFE INSURANCE CO.LTD.  
  DID NOT FILL PROPOSAL FORM AS PER REGULATION 4(3) OF IRDA (PROTECTION OF POLICYHOLDERS’ INTERESTS) REGULATIONS, 2002

DID NOT FILL PROPOSAL FORM AS PER REGULATION 13 OF IRDA (INSURANCE ADVERTISEMENTS & DISCLOSURE) REGULATIONS, 2000  
IMPOSED PENALTY RS.4,00,000

24-OCT-2019
 
18
History of entity/person TATA AIA LIFE INSURANCE CO.LTD.  
  MICRO INSURANCE AGENT SIGNED HIMSELF ON BEHALF OF LIFE ASSURED IN PROPOSAL FORM ON BEHALF OF LIFE ASSURED VIOLATING PROVISIONS OF REGULATION 3(4) OF IRDA (PROTECTION OF POLICYHOLDERS’ INTEREST) REGULATIONS, 2002   CENSURED/WARNED & DIRECTED/ADVISED TO BE DILIGENT IN COMPLYING WITH ALL THE ACTS, REGULATIONS ETC.

09-OCT-2015
 
19
History of entity/person TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE CO.LTD.  
  COLLECTED RENEWAL PREMIUM FOR THREE YEARS IN ADVANCE OUT OF THE LOAN GRANTED BY CORPORATE AGENT VIOLATING REGULATIONS 3(2) AND 3(3) OF IRDA (PROTECTION OF POLICYHOLDERS’ INTERESTS) REGULATIONS, 2002   IMPOSED PENALTY RS.1,00,00,000

29-JAN-2020
 
20
History of entity/person UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO.LTD.  
  DID NOT BOOK LIABILITY AS SOON AS INTIMATION RECEIVED FROM CLAIMANTS

PAID BROKERAGE FOR THE POLICIES ISSUED TO GIF, GUJARAT STATE THROUGH DIRECTORATE OF INSURANCE, GOVT. OF GUJARAT

DELAY IN SUBMISSION OF SURVEYOR'S REPORTS

DELAY IN SETTLEMENT OF CLAIMS

PROCURED BUSINESS EITHER WITHOUT OBTAINING AND/OR BEFORE OBTAINING NOC

DID NOT FILE CO-BRANDED ADVERTISEMENTS REFERRED IN SUBMISSION AND PAID TO CORPORATE AGENT AS A PERCENTAGE OF PREMIUM AND DID NOT PROVIDE COPY OF CLAIMS REQUESTS RECEIVED FROM LICENSED ENTITY

DEVIATED FROM DISCOUNT STRUCTURE APPROVED BY IRDA UNDER F&U DIRECTIVES/INSTRUCTIONS/GUIDELINES BY OFFERING HIGHER DISCOUNTS

DID NOT ADHERE TO FILE & USE DIRECTIVES/INSTRUCTIONS/GUIDELINES

PAID COMMISSION OVER & ABOVE INFRASTRUCTURE EXPENSES TO UNLICENSED ENTITIES

DID NOT REGISTER CLAIM CASES AND NOT CREATED PROVISION

DELAY IN RECEIVING PREMIUM FROM INSURER  
IMPOSED PENALTY RS.60,00,000

22-APR-2015
 
The regulatory charges/regulatory actions may be fully or partly applicable to the entities/persons mentioned in the second column.
 
First Next Last  
Page 1 of 2  
top